MSG Team's other articles

11138 Role of Management/Organization in Overcoming Leadership Challenges

It is rightly said that if you get a good boss, you are the luckiest employee and if your boss does not support you, God can only save you! Leaders are appointed to provide a direction to the team members and also motivate them to deliver their level best. Is there any employee who admits […]

11559 Time Management in Corporates – Need and its Importance

Time Management refers to making the best possible use of time and doing the right thing at the right time. Managing time well plays a pivotal role in finishing off tasks within the stipulated time frame and also increases productivity of an individual. Employees must learn to manage time well at the workplace to achieve […]

8863 Decision Making Dilemma Managers Face: How to Grow Companies in a Time of Crisis?

In the previous articles, we discussed how decision making in these times is fraught with risk, uncertainty, and ambiguity. In this article, we examine a key dilemma facing managers in these times when economic conditions are gloomy. For starters, managers face the unenviable task of returning high profits in a time of inflationary pressures. This […]

12570 Business Negotiations

Negotiations can be called as a way of resolving disputes. It is considered as being synonymous to settlement, agreement, collaboration and bargaining. It takes place almost in all spheres of life – be it is business, personal circumstances (married life, parenting, etc.), legal procedures, government matters, etc. Negotiation can be defined as a channel of […]

8894 Democratic and Socialist Goals of Public Administration

The role and functions of the Government and the bureaucracy is that which keeps constantly evolving in the wake of developments and changes in and around the world. During our discourse we have seen how the academic discipline of public administration has evolved. It has undergone reforms and has been influenced by developments in other […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In 1960, Douglas McGregor formulated Theory X and Theory Y suggesting two aspects of human behaviour at work, or in other words, two different views of individuals (employees):

  1. one of which is negative, called as Theory X and

  2. the other is positive, so called as Theory Y

According to McGregor, the perception of managers on the nature of individuals is based on various assumptions.

Assumptions of Theory X

  • An average employee intrinsically does not like work and tries to escape it whenever possible.

  • Since the employee does not want to work, he must be persuaded, compelled, or warned with punishment so as to achieve organizational goals. A close supervision is required on part of managers. The managers adopt a more dictatorial style.

  • Many employees rank job security on top, and they have little or no aspiration/ ambition.

  • Employees generally dislike responsibilities.

  • Employees resist change.

  • An average employee needs formal direction.

Assumptions of Theory Y

  • Employees can perceive their job as relaxing and normal. They exercise their physical and mental efforts in an inherent manner in their jobs.

  • Employees may not require only threat, external control and coercion to work, but they can use self-direction and self-control if they are dedicated and sincere to achieve the organizational objectives.

  • If the job is rewarding and satisfying, then it will result in employees’ loyalty and commitment to organization.

  • An average employee can learn to admit and recognize the responsibility. In fact, he can even learn to obtain responsibility.

  • The employees have skills and capabilities. Their logical capabilities should be fully utilized.

    In other words, the creativity, resourcefulness and innovative potentiality of the employees can be utilized to solve organizational problems.

Thus, we can say that Theory X presents a pessimistic view of employees’ nature and behaviour at work, while Theory Y presents an optimistic view of the employees’ nature and behaviour at work.

If we correlate it with Maslow’s theory, we can say that Theory X is based on the assumption that the employees emphasize on the physiological needs and the safety needs; while Theory X is based on the assumption that the social needs, esteem needs and the self-actualization needs dominate the employees.

McGregor views Theory Y to be more valid and reasonable than Theory X. Thus, he encouraged cordial team relations, responsible and stimulating jobs, and participation of all in decision-making process.

Implications of Theory X and Theory Y

  • Quite a few organizations use Theory X today. Theory X encourages use of tight control and supervision. It implies that employees are reluctant to organizational changes. Thus, it does not encourage innovation.

  • Many organizations are using Theory Y techniques. Theory Y implies that the managers should create and encourage a work environment which provides opportunities to employees to take initiative and self-direction. Employees should be given opportunities to contribute to organizational well-being.

    Theory Y encourages decentralization of authority, teamwork and participative decision making in an organization.

    Theory Y searches and discovers the ways in which an employee can make significant contributions in an organization. It harmonizes and matches employees’ needs and aspirations with organizational needs and aspirations.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles