MSG Team's other articles

11575 Tips for Students and MBA Aspirants to Improve Communication

MBA Aspirant needs to master his communication skills to perform exceptionally well in MBA from a reputed Business school and prove his mettle while studying as well as in the corporate world. He should definitely have an edge over the other candidates, if he has excellent and impressive communication skills. Let us go through some […]

10537 Organizational Vision, Mission, Strategy and Change Management

Organizational vision & mission, provide a sense of purpose or establish the the reason of existence of an organization. According to Sullivan & Harper 1996, a well-defined organizational vision establishes both long term and short term goals, empower and motivate leaders as well as followers in implementing change and strengthening their adaptive mechanisms for staying […]

11680 Types of Managerial Communication

Managerial communication refers to interaction among managers and their subordinates within an organization. It is essential for managers to communicate with their team members and vice a versa to ensure maximum productivity and peace at workplace. Communication generally takes place as: Downward communication – Flow of information from managers to employees Upward Communication – Flow […]

12117 How to Conduct High Stakes Negotiations in the Digital Age without Being Short-changed

Negotiations are Part and Parcel of our Daily Lives Negotiations are part and parcel of our lives. Whether it is bargaining with the vegetable vendor or haggling with the butcher, we are all exposed to negotiations as part of our existence. Thus, one cannot but master negotiating skills if one to has to navigate the […]

11942 Why Change Management Programs Often Fail? Some Ways to Actualize Change

We have heard the story several times. A large conglomerate wants to implement a change management program, which it then announces amidst much fanfare and hype. The top leadership waxes eloquent on the need to change and why the organization must actualize change. However, a few years down the line, things are still bad for […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In 1960, Douglas McGregor formulated Theory X and Theory Y suggesting two aspects of human behaviour at work, or in other words, two different views of individuals (employees):

  1. one of which is negative, called as Theory X and

  2. the other is positive, so called as Theory Y

According to McGregor, the perception of managers on the nature of individuals is based on various assumptions.

Assumptions of Theory X

  • An average employee intrinsically does not like work and tries to escape it whenever possible.

  • Since the employee does not want to work, he must be persuaded, compelled, or warned with punishment so as to achieve organizational goals. A close supervision is required on part of managers. The managers adopt a more dictatorial style.

  • Many employees rank job security on top, and they have little or no aspiration/ ambition.

  • Employees generally dislike responsibilities.

  • Employees resist change.

  • An average employee needs formal direction.

Assumptions of Theory Y

  • Employees can perceive their job as relaxing and normal. They exercise their physical and mental efforts in an inherent manner in their jobs.

  • Employees may not require only threat, external control and coercion to work, but they can use self-direction and self-control if they are dedicated and sincere to achieve the organizational objectives.

  • If the job is rewarding and satisfying, then it will result in employees’ loyalty and commitment to organization.

  • An average employee can learn to admit and recognize the responsibility. In fact, he can even learn to obtain responsibility.

  • The employees have skills and capabilities. Their logical capabilities should be fully utilized.

    In other words, the creativity, resourcefulness and innovative potentiality of the employees can be utilized to solve organizational problems.

Thus, we can say that Theory X presents a pessimistic view of employees’ nature and behaviour at work, while Theory Y presents an optimistic view of the employees’ nature and behaviour at work.

If we correlate it with Maslow’s theory, we can say that Theory X is based on the assumption that the employees emphasize on the physiological needs and the safety needs; while Theory X is based on the assumption that the social needs, esteem needs and the self-actualization needs dominate the employees.

McGregor views Theory Y to be more valid and reasonable than Theory X. Thus, he encouraged cordial team relations, responsible and stimulating jobs, and participation of all in decision-making process.

Implications of Theory X and Theory Y

  • Quite a few organizations use Theory X today. Theory X encourages use of tight control and supervision. It implies that employees are reluctant to organizational changes. Thus, it does not encourage innovation.

  • Many organizations are using Theory Y techniques. Theory Y implies that the managers should create and encourage a work environment which provides opportunities to employees to take initiative and self-direction. Employees should be given opportunities to contribute to organizational well-being.

    Theory Y encourages decentralization of authority, teamwork and participative decision making in an organization.

    Theory Y searches and discovers the ways in which an employee can make significant contributions in an organization. It harmonizes and matches employees’ needs and aspirations with organizational needs and aspirations.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles