MSG Team's other articles

12734 Charles Handy Model of Organization Culture

What is an organization? An organization is a setup where individuals (employees) come together to work for a common goal. It is essential for the employees to work in close coordination, deliver their level bests and achieve the targets within the stipulated time frame for the smooth functioning of the organization. Every organization has certain […]

10380 What is Modified Coinsurance and How it Works

A reinsurance contract is essentially a contract between a ceding insurance company as well as a reinsurance company. Under plain vanilla reinsurance contracts, the premiums, as well as risks, are transferred proportionately from the ceding insurer to the reinsurance company. In some cases, this arrangement is not acceptable to one or both of the parties. […]

8866 Decision Making in Self Directed Teams

In many organizations, it is often the practice to give autonomy to many teams and let them take the decisions that affect their day to day affairs as well as some strategic issues. These are the so-called self-directed teams that exist in all organizations where the managers of these teams take the decisions regarding the […]

9248 Expectancy Theory of Motivation

The expectancy theory was proposed by Victor Vroom of Yale School of Management in 1964. Vroom stresses and focuses on outcomes, and not on needs unlike Maslow and Herzberg. The theory states that the intensity of a tendency to perform in a particular manner is dependent on the intensity of an expectation that the performance […]

10295 Marketing Agility: A Step towards Acquiring Organizational Agility

Does marketing agility really make sense, or is it like another buzz word? The question itself carries sagacity because it’s important to understand if this term really makes sense in today’s business environment or is just a fad. The answer is – marketing agility is the real thing. It’s not yet another trend. Nor it […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

One of the most widely used frameworks for analyzing cultural differences is the model developed by the eminent cultural theorist, Geert Hofstede.

In this model, the differences in culture between countries have been plotted along five dimensions, which can be used as the basis for predicting the cultural differences between different countries.

The model was developed after extensive research into the cultural differences between different countries and after surveys of thousands of employees in the West and the East.

The five dimensions along which the cultural differences are plotted are power distance, masculinity vs. femininity, long-term orientation vs. short-term thinking, individualism vs. collectivism, and uncertainty avoidance. The model is comprehensive and exhaustive in its treatment of cultural differences across cultures.

To take the first dimension, power distance measures the extent to which hierarchy dominates the work environment. In the US, the power distance is relatively small when compared to China where the power distance is more because of the hierarchical nature of Chinese society.

Similarly, the Masculine traits predominate in India and China as compared to the US and UK as the cultures in the former tends towards patriarchy.

The third dimension of individualism vs. collectivism yields the result that employees in the West would be highly individualistic as compared to the employees in the East who subscribe to the group instead of to the individual.

The fourth dimension of long-term thinking vs. short-term thinking is likewise different in the US and the UK where the emphasis is on getting the short-term results whereas in China and India, there is a tendency to look ahead into the future.

Finally, the fifth dimension of uncertainty avoidance refers to the structured work environment, which in the West would be oriented towards specific and measurable goals and objectives whereas out of the box thinking is prevalent in the East.

The Hofstede model is useful for expatriate managers who when they work in the East find it easy to understand the cultural differences in the work environment. Using this model, the expatriate managers can be trained to adjust to the different cultures.

To take an example, it is common in the East (China and India) to be hierarchical in the organizational structure where the position and the status of the employee matters a lot.

Given the fact that in the West, these are important but not to the extent that they are in the East, expatriate managers can learn to negotiate cultural differences using this model.

Another important aspect is that culturally China and India are male dominated, which is different from the US, and the UK where gender equality is prevalent. Hence, the expatriate managers can likewise adjust to the East when they work there using this model.

Finally, for expatriate managers to adjust to the local cultures, adopting a “Glocal” approach would be the ideal solution. This approach wherein a global outlook is combined with a local approach means that multinationals can adapt themselves to the local cultures and at the same time do not lose focus of their global vision. This is the most important learning that the Hofstede model and the other models of culture provide to the expatriate managers.

In conclusion, cultural differences can make or mar the chances of multinationals in the globalized world economy of the present. Hence, it is important to realize and understand that culture plays a prominent part in shaping the work environment.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Communicating Across Cultures

MSG Team

The Business Case for Organizational Diversity

MSG Team