Hofstede Model of Organization Culture
Organization culture refers to the various ideologies, beliefs and practices of an organization which make it different from others. The culture of any workplace decides how employees would behave with each other or with the external parties and also decide their involvement in productive tasks. Hofstede also known as Geert Hofstede proposed that national and […]
Tips for Effective Managerial Communication
It is essential for employees to communicate effectively with each other for better understanding as well as increased productivity at workplace. Employees doing everything on their own are generally overburdened and eventually fail to deliver their best. Effective managerial communication enables the flow of information and knowledge among employees in its desired form. Managers need […]
Management Skills – Leadership Skills for Efficient Functioning of an Organization
The success and failure of an organization is directly proportional to the effectiveness of the management. The superiors must share a healthy relationship with the employees for them to deliver their level best. Leaders need to acquire certain skill sets for an efficient functioning: Management needs to be impartial towards its employees. Rules and policies […]
Fixing Pay Gap and Promotion Deficiency: Walking the Talk on Diversity in the Post MeToo World!
As #MeToo Turns Nearly A Decade Old, Time For Corporate America to Walk the Talk on D&I The viral #MeToo movement represented a “coming of age” for career women worldwide as they sought to highlight the pervasive sexual harassment and gender discrimination in workplaces the world over. The very success of #MeToo as a “spontaneous” […]
Digital Communication System
The transmission of information from the sender to the recipient through some medium is called as communication. Communication enables us to know what is happening around us. It helps us to share our knowledge with others and also gain from other individual’s thoughts and ideas. Communication takes place through various routes and channels and with […]
In response to the fast changing and fluid marketplace and industry landscapes, many management thinkers came with theories of strategic change.
The first among them was the legendary Peter Drucker who coined the term Age of Discontinuity to describe the way in which disruptive change affects us.
In Drucker’s model, the four sources of discontinuity are globalization, cultural pluralism, knowledge capital, and new technologies.
The main idea behind this theory is that extrapolating into the future by using the existing models is ineffective as the rapidity with which change was barreling down on corporations made all models redundant within no time. Instead, what Drucker proposed was that firms explore the drivers of change and strategize according to which aspect was most likely to affect the firm in the future.
Another management thinker, Alvin Toffler, came up with an idea about the intersection of different paradigms and the accelerating rates of change and their impact on businesses. He used the term Future Shock to describe how the changes in technology, move towards globalism, resource constraints, and finally, the shortening of time itself were akin to the future arriving even before one could prepare for it and hence he likened human civilization being shocked by the future.
In recent years, Malcolm Gladwell, used the term Tipping Points, to describe the phenomenon of trends acquiring critical mass and then taking off to impact business and society in the process.
In addition, Gary Hamel postulated the concept of Strategic Decay to explain how the value of each strategy decays over time irrespective of how brilliant the strategy was in the first place.
What these thinkers were attempting is to explain how change is the only constant and hence, businesses ought to be prepared for anything to happen and hence must strategize and build their business models accordingly.
After the discussion on the theorists and their ideas, it is time to consider how strategic change is actualized in the real world.
The example of Nokia which was one of the leading makers of the mobile handsets till a few years ago and which now finds itself at the bottom of the heap along with Blackberry reminds us that the strategic drift occurs without anyone noticing it and by the time it is noticed, it is too late.
On the other hand, the collapse of once famous companies like Chrysler point to the transformational change that is sudden and radical in nature.
The key aspect about strategic change is that it is difficult to predict and control. Hence, the optimal way to deal with it is to expect the unexpected and be ready for anything.
Unless companies embrace change, they are likely to be fossilized and unless companies prepare to deal with sudden, unpredictable, discontinuous, and radical change, they are likely to go the way of the dinosaurs.
Finally, many companies proclaim that they are changing whereas it is superficial and the world comes to know later on that their change models were neither broad nor deep.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
How Relevant is the Corporate Planning Function in the Digital Age of Agile Organizations
February 12, 2025
Contingency Model of Change Management: Dunphy and Stace’s Model of Change
February 12, 2025
