Corporate Corruption and the HRM Function: Legal, Ethical, and Moral Perspectives
February 12, 2025
Organizational career development process includes both individuals and institutions. Individuals plan their own careers whereas institutions or organizations manage the careers of the employees. Career planning by an individual includes several sub processes such as occupational choices, organizational choices, job assignment choices and career self-development. While the major sub processes of career management by organizations […]
Employee Development refers to steps taken by an organization to enhance the skills of an employee and motivate him/her to acquire new knowledge and leanings. Employee development activities upgrade an individual’s existing knowledge, sharpen his/her skills and also prepare him/her to take up new opportunities in the future. As a result of trainings and employee […]
Entrepreneurship has become fashionable. A lot of people want to become entrepreneurs and are in need of ideas and resources which they can use to create the business of their dreams. This tendency has been exploited by many firms in the past century. A new type of scam called the “pyramid schemes” has come into […]
Do you see various shapes in a crumpled ball of paper? Do you see various colours in a drop of oil mixed with water? If your answer is yes, then certainly you value creativity. Creativity is nothing but the process of creating something unique and new. Creativity indeed plays a crucial role in organizations at […]
Introduction One of the key challenges that HR (Human Resource) Managers face in any organization is how they respond to employees violating organizational policies and plain disgruntled employees who are angry with their appraisals and consequent pay hikes and bonuses. Indeed, how astutely and adroitly the HR Managers deal with such employees determines their competency […]
In recent times, there has been a trend in multinational companies to have a people manager apart from the project manager for employees in teams and units. This division of responsibilities between the people manager and the project manager has been necessitated because of the importance being given to employee enabling and employee empowering strategies.
The key aspect here is that the people manager is responsible for the personal and professional development of the employee and the project manager is responsible for work and project related activities.
Further, the appointment of a people manager distinct from the project manager is being done because of the need felt by the organizations to develop the employees in a more rounded manner and to let them actualize their potential.
For instance, while the project manager looks after the project deliverables and associated work related aspects, the people manager concentrates on the personal development of skills, soft attributes, and how far the employee is fulfilled in his or her current role.
The post of people manager is akin to the HR manager who is responsible for the unit but differs in the respects of having a functional individual be the people manager who can understand the functional and operational aspects as well as contribute to the personality development of the employee.
In many multinational organizations like Fidelity and IBM, the people manager is designated from the pool of project managers and is usually responsible for two or three project teams.
The additional responsibilities vested in the people manager run concurrent to their core responsibilities of looking after their own teams’ project deliverables. The idea here is to have an independent individual separate and distinct from the project manager to introduce objectivity and to provide an unbiased perspective to the employee and his or her needs for personal development and actualization.
Further, some multinationals have also experimented with having a people manager who does not have any project related responsibilities so that the person can fully focus and concentrate on the people side of project management.
The key aspect here is that the people manager would conduct one-one meetings with the employees to find out if they have any issues with the project teams and their role in it and to elicit feedback from them about how the organization and the project managers are letting them fulfill their potential.
At appraisal time, it is usually the case that the review would be conducted by both the project manager and the people manager. Of course, the inputs of the project manager are more important as they pertain to the core reason for the organization’s existence namely that of project deliverables but the people manager has a significant role to play in determining the personal development and the progress made by the employee towards his or her personal development goals as set forth at the start of the review period.
The reason why many organizations are keen to have the post of a people manager is mainly because of the need felt by the organizations to treat people as key assets and sources of competitive advantage as opposed to treating them as yet another factor of production. This shift in emphasis or paradigm shift is known as the strategic human resource management perspective wherein employees are considered the chief asset and sources of sustainable advantage to the organizations.
When compared to the earlier paradigms where employees were treated as yet another factor of production and the intervening paradigm where employees were considered important but not to the level that is being witnessed in the SHRM view.
The reason for this is the rise in the services sector wherein technology and financial services firms have taken center stage in the economy and where people make the difference between success and failure. This is the key aspect of multinationals having a people manager distinct from a project manager.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *