MSG Team's other articles

12766 Closing a Six Sigma Project

As we have seen, Six Sigma is an elaborate methodology. It requires time to learn and even more time to successfully implement. However, as we have also seen that there is a golden pot at the end of the rainbow. Countless organizations have transformed their operations based on their Six Sigma capabilities. Nowadays, having processes […]

9254 Export Marketing Channels

For any Business Organization which is eyeing a foreign market as a part of its Exports strategy, getting its Marketing and Supply chain in place forms a critical part of the initial process which will determine his initial foray into the markets. While doing business in foreign markets is very lucrative, the initial cost of […]

9383 The Fortune 100 Corporations and the Awesome Power They Have

The Fortune 100 list of companies comprises of the top 100 corporations in the world in terms of size, revenues, and market capitalization. The list that is published annually gives a peek into the top corporations that run the global economy. Indeed, many commentators have stated that the top 10 corporations in the world are […]

12746 China’s Wealth Gap Problem

Traditionally China has been one of the red states. This means that China traditionally adopted the policy of communism. Hence, one would expect the income and wealth disparity in China to be limited. However, surprisingly, that is not the case. China has one of the biggest wealth disparities in the world. For instance, the top […]

11263 The Shock of Gray and Its Implications for the Healthcare Sector

What is meant by the Shock of Gray and its Implications? The Shock of Gray is a term used to describe the ageing of the populations in the West with the retirement of the Baby Boomer generation and the resultant “graying” of the western societies. This phenomenon has several economic implications mainly related to the […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The Pugh Matrix is one of the most widely used methods of finding out the best solution once a number of alternate solutions have been generated. The success of the Pugh Matrix is in its simplicity. The tool is not very mathematically intensive and fairly simple to use. However, it has a record of coming up with the same solutions as mathematically intensive solutions would albeit with much less effort. Here is a step by step guide to use the Pugh Matrix.

Step 1: List down the Criteria in a Vertical List

The first step of the exercise is to list down the criteria that will be used for evaluation. The criteria is listed in a vertical list towards the extreme left of the paper or spreadsheet being used. Although the possible criteria could be many, the Pugh Matrix suggests using at least 3 viz. technological impact, cost impact and organizational acceptance.

Step 2: Select the Datum

The next step in the process is to select the Datum. The Datum is nothing but what the Six Sigma project team believes to be the initial most feasible solution. Selecting the appropriate datum is important because every solution will be evaluated against the datum.

Step 3: List down the Alternative Solutions Horizontally

After the datum, list down all the alternative solutions horizontally. This will create a matrix with the criteria on the vertical axis and the solutions on the horizontal axis.

Step 4: Marking the Pugh Matrix

Pugh Matrix is marked using “+”, “–” or “S”.

+” means a particular solution scores better on a particular criteria as compared to the datum

“–” means a particular solution doesn’t score better on a particular criteria as compared to the datum

“S” means a particular solution scores the same on a particular criteria as compared to the datum

The datum by default has “S” rating assigned to all its criteria. This is because it is the same as itself and hence has the score 0.

No numerical values are assigned to the positives or negatives. This can be seen as one problem of the Pugh Matrix. If a solution is just a little inferior to the datum or very inferior to the datum, both will receive the same score on the matrix. However, this is where the Pugh Matrix relies on human judgement.

Step 5: Aggregating the Scores

The scores are aggregated by counting the number of “+” and “–” that a solution has. Many times weights are attached to criteria. Thus gaining a “+” on 1 criteria will be considered as 1.5 “+” while aggregating the scores.

The “+” and “–” are then used to compare the final score. If any solution has a score greater than 0 i.e. greater than the datum, it is considered for selection. If all the scores are less than “0”, then the datum is selected as the final solution.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Creating a SIPOC Chart

MSG Team

Check Sheet – A Basic Six Sigma Tool

MSG Team

Challenges Faced in Conducting Voice of Customer Exercise

MSG Team