MSG Team's other articles

11232 How Self Driving Cars Impact Insurance?

Almost all of the tech giants in the world today are trying to launch their version of self-driving cars. Diverse companies like Google, Uber and even Apple are all queuing up, trying to create the first driverless car which will be used by consumers. Up until now, these companies have made some progress. However, neither […]

11437 Structural Functional Approach to Public Administration

The structural functional approach to public administration is a term adapted from sociology and anthropology which interprets society as a structure with interrelated parts. This approach was developed by the celebrated anthropologist Malinowski and Radcliff Brown. So, according to them, a society has a structure and functions. These functions are norms, customs, traditions and institutions […]

10530 Benefits of Organizational Diversity

Why do you think an individual is recruited? Is it because he/she is qualified enough to do justice to a particular role or he/she belongs to the religion you belong? The answer is very simple. Obviously an individual is hired because the company feels that he/she can contribute to his/her level best towards achieving organization […]

9078 Effect of Communication Barriers in Business Communication

An organization is an individual’s first home as one spends the maximum time here only. No organization runs for charity, it is really important that the organization achieve its goals. How does an organization become successful? How will an organization achieve its goals?. The employees are the assets for any organization and the profitability of […]

12117 How to Conduct High Stakes Negotiations in the Digital Age without Being Short-changed

Negotiations are Part and Parcel of our Daily Lives Negotiations are part and parcel of our lives. Whether it is bargaining with the vegetable vendor or haggling with the butcher, we are all exposed to negotiations as part of our existence. Thus, one cannot but master negotiating skills if one to has to navigate the […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Rensis Likert and his associates studied the patterns and styles of managers for three decades at the University of Michigan, USA, and identified a four-fold model of management systems.

The model was developed on the basis of a questionnaire administered to managers in over 200 organizations and research into the performance characteristics of different types of organizations.

The four systems of management system or the four leadership styles identified by Likert are:

  1. System 1 - Exploitative Authoritative: Responsibility lies in the hands of the people at the upper echelons of the hierarchy. The superior has no trust and confidence in subordinates.

    The decisions are imposed on subordinates and they do not feel free at all to discuss things about the job with their superior. The teamwork or communication is very little and the motivation is based on threats.

  2. System 2 - Benevolent Authoritative: The responsibility lies at the managerial levels but not at the lower levels of the organizational hierarchy. The superior has condescending confidence and trust in subordinates (master-servant relationship).

    Here again, the subordinates do not feel free to discuss things about the job with their superior. The teamwork or communication is very little and motivation is based on a system of rewards.

  3. System 3 - Consultative: Responsibility is spread widely through the organizational hierarchy. The superior has substantial but not complete confidence in subordinates.

    Some amount of discussion about job related things takes place between the superior and subordinates. There is a fair amount of teamwork, and communication takes place vertically and horizontally. The motivation is based on rewards and involvement in the job.

  4. System 4 - Participative: Responsibility for achieving the organizational goals is widespread throughout the organizational hierarchy.

    There is a high level of confidence that the superior has in his subordinates. There is a high level of teamwork, communication, and participation.

The nature of these four management systems has been described by Likert through a profile of organizational characteristics. In this profile, the four management systems have been compared with one another on the basis of certain organizational variables which are:

  • Leadership processes
  • Motivational forces
  • Communication process
  • Interaction-influence process
  • Decision-making process
  • Goal-setting or ordering
  • Control processes

On the basis of this profile, Likert administered a questionnaire to several employees belonging to different organizations and from different managerial positions (both line and staff).

His studies confirmed that the departments or units employing management practices within Systems 1 and 2 were the least productive, and the departments or units employing management practices within Systems 3 and 4 were the most productive.

Advantages of Likert’s Management System

With the help of the profile developed by Likert, it became possible to quantify the results of the work done in the field of group dynamics.

Likert theory also facilitated the measurement of the “soft” areas of management, such as trust and communication.

Conclusion

According to Rensis Likert, the nearer the behavioral characteristics of an organization approach System 4 (Participative), the more likely this will lead to long-term improvement in staff turnover and high productivity, low scrap, low costs, and high earnings if an organization wants to achieve optimum effectiveness, then the ideal system

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Cultural Dimensions of Leadership

MSG Team

Continuum of Leadership Behaviour

MSG Team