Issues With Sponsorship Levels
In the previous article, we have already seen what sponsorship tiers or sponsorship levels are. We have also seen the various benefits that such a sponsorship arrangement can provide to both the sponsor as well as the sponsored sports entity. Hence, we know why sponsorship levels are widely used as a financing arrangement across various […]
Debt to Equity Ratio – Meaning, Assumptions and Interpretation
The debt to equity ratio is the most important of all capital adequacy ratios. It is seen by investors and analysts worldwide as the true measure of riskiness of the firm. This ratio is often quoted in the financials of the company as well as in discussions pertaining to the financial health of the company […]
The Lawsuit Between Spotify and Apple Corporation
Spotify, which is one of the largest music streaming websites in the world, has filed an anti-trust lawsuit against Apple Incorporated. Spotify alleges that Apple has been using unfair strategies in order to gain an unassailable competitive advantage. The spat between Spotify and Apple is nothing new. However, now it has embroiled into a full-fledged […]
Bretton Woods Agreement and Smithsonian Agreement
The transition of the world monetary system from gold standard to the modern Forex markets was anything but smooth. Governments from all over the world collaborated to make two pacts which would form the basis of the modern monetary system. However, both the arrangements failed. In this article, we will have a closer look at […]
Fundamental Principles of Accounting
Following are the basic fundamental principles of Accounting: Monetary Unit Accounting needs all values to be recorded in terms of a single monetary unit. It cannot account for goods like the barter system. Assigning values to goods and items therefore becomes a problem since it is subjective. However, accounting has prescribed rules to deal with […]
We are now aware of how to use the basic single stage models for both free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) and free cash flow to equity (FCFE). It is now time to look into more advanced models which involve two or more stages for which cash flows will be predicted.
Now, we need to understand that there is no finite number of models for calculating the value of the firm using these metrics. We could have an infinite number of models, if we just tweak the assumptions pertaining to free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) and free cash flow to equity (FCFE) a little bit.
Listing down all the models which are used will overwhelm any students. Instead we must look at what causes the variations in these models. We will do so in this article.
The first question we need to answer is how many stages of cash flow projections we need to assume at arrive at a fair valuation.
Let’s first define what a stage means and why it is important. A stage of cash flow is a group of years wherein the cash flow of the firm will behave in a similar manner.
For instance, if a firm will experience a 7% growth in its free cash flows for the next 5 years, then for calculation ease we can combine these 5 years into 1 stage and use a single formula to derive a valuation for all these five years.
The common variations used are two stage, three stage and even spreadsheet modeling wherein every year is considered separately and the concept of stages does not apply at all.
The number of stages that are used by the analyst in valuation are connected to the characteristic of the firm being valued.
In the forthcoming years, the firm may experience positive cash flows growing at a high rate and then the growth rate may fall down before finally the free cash flows stabilize. In this case, a three stage model may be relevant
Hence, based on the characteristics of the firm, the relevant model may be decided.
The next question which arises is that which metric of free cash flow should be used. Would free cash flow to the firm provide a more accurate forecast? Or would free cash flow to equity be more relevant? This is a fairly simple question to answer.
If we are only considering the point of view of equity shareholders, then we must use free cash flow to equity. In other cases, free cash flow to the firm may be used. So every model will have two variations like two stage model using free cash flow to the firm and two stage model using free cash flow to equity.
The next question pertains to how to calculate the growth rates for the cash flow metric choses. When we were using dividends, we had no option but to make assumptions regarding what the growth rate of dividends will be.
When it comes to free cash flows, we have two options:
For instance, we could use changes in net borrowing and working capital investment as input and derive free cash flow to equity as output. This model is more accurate. However, it also necessitates that the analyst must have access to information about how the company plans to change its cash flows in future periods.
For a short period of time, let’s say 5 years, this information is obtainable. Beyond that, it is pure speculation since not even the company would be in a position to make an accurate forecast for such a long time horizon.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Calculating Free Cash Flow to the Firm: Method #2: Cash Flow From Operations
February 12, 2025
