MSG Team's other articles

10332 Media as an Instrument of Control vs. Media as an Agent of Change

Media as an Instrument of Control In many countries, the media is used by the government as an instrument of control and for propaganda purposes. For instance, the Chinese media is heavily controlled and censorship is direct and deep. In countries like the United States, though there is no explicit control, the media is expected […]

9985 International Retailing and Retail Logistics Challenges

International Retailing is seeing exciting times. With globalisation and availability of new market opportunities, we see a lot of aggression from International Retailers in consolidating their operations within the country and setting up new outlets in emerging markets such as South East Asia. International buying and supply chain has undergone a series of evolution since […]

12191 Social Media Impact on Consumer Behavior

What Average People Think of Social Media ? Average people think of social media as a leisure activity. They think social media exists so that they can connect with their friends and family and share what is important to them. That is exactly what it is from a consumer point of view. It is a […]

10444 Need for a Uniform International Corporate Governance Code

With the globalization of the world economy starting in the 1970s, continuing through the 1980s and accelerating since the 1990s reaching its zenith in the first decade of the new millennium, there has been a concomitant trend of global corporations expanding their international footprint and operating in multiple countries around the world. This meant that […]

11230 Self-Checkout Apps: The Future of Retail

The business of retail has always been evolving with technology. Companies which have been at the helm of technology have dominated the retail sector. Consider the case of Wal-Mart which reached new heights in retail thanks to pioneering the RFID based inventory system. Similarly, Amazon has been using its technological advancement to give tough competition […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The previous articles discussed how shareholders play an important role in promoting good corporate governance. This article looks at the patterns of shareholder ownership that are prevalent in organizations in the corporate world. To start with, any company whether it is private or public limited needs to have shareholders who contribute equity to the setting up of the company and who in turn trade the shares so as to enhance the market value of the firm. In this way, shareholders exercise ownership over the company with their stake in the company.

The forms of shareholder ownership can be in many ways and some of them include outright control of the company by the majority shareholders, participation on the board of directors in proportion to their holding in the company and finally, being minority shareholders in a company and having voting rights accordingly. These patterns of shareholder ownership are more or less followed all over the world.

Turning to the aspect of exercising control over companies, shareholders often resort to having their representatives on the board of directors who would then see to it that the interests of the shareholders are being taken care of. This is the dominant view of the shareholder ownership where the numbers and the way in which a majority stake is held by a particular shareholder bestow ownership rights to the shareholders. Of course, theoretically speaking, all shareholders are owners of the companies and accordingly have power over the actions of the company. However, in practice, it is usually those with the greater numbers who exercise control over the companies. Hence, it can be said that shareholder ownership follows democratic principles wherein the largest shareholder has more control than the minority shareholders.

It is often the case that shareholder ownership is seen as a phenomenon that is fraught with risk. This is because the shareholders by virtue of their holdings represent ownership which can also boomerang if the company goes belly up. What we mean is that since shareholders are owners of the companies, in case of failure they take the hit as well. This is not the case with those who own debentures and bonds in the companies. Hence, it is the shareholders who are liable for risks. On the other hand, as long as things are going fine, it is the shareholders who reap the rewards for their holdings and their risk taking behavior.

Finally, shareholder ownership is a phenomenon that allows for fair corporate decision making and a sense of responsibility and shared risk taking.

The point here is that without a body of investors who would be willing to invest in a company, the promoters might not be able to raise the capital that is needed for the firm. Further, the risk is spread out over more numbers rather than the promoters having to shoulder the entire burden. In these ways, the shareholder ownership has evolved to the point where it has become a prerequisite for good corporate governance.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Corporate Governance – An Overview

MSG Team