Pension Funds and Fiduciary Duty
Whenever investors pool their resources together in order to create a fund that then invests in other assets, the concept of fiduciary duty comes into play. The average investor considers fiduciary duty to be a complex legal subject and hence tries to avoid delving into the details. However, the subject is not very complex. Also, […]
Benefits and Drawbacks of Straight-Through Processing
In the previous article, we have already seen what straight-through processing is and how it is different from the usual commercial lending processes adopted by commercial banks. We now know that straight-through processing is a futuristic technology-based business model which all commercial banks are working towards. Right now, the model is not used in many […]
Zero-Coupon Bonds: Pros and Cons
Zero-coupon bonds are those bonds that are sold at a deep discount to their face value. This means that these bonds do not receive any periodic interest. Instead, the investors have to invest a lump sum amount at the beginning of their investment and get paid a higher lumpsum amount at the end of their […]
Risks Associated with Sponsorship from Sponsored Entity’s Perspective
In the previous article, we have already seen that sponsorship is not really a risk-free activity. We became aware of the various types of risks which are faced by sponsors when they provide monetary assistance to sporting leagues. However, it is important to realize that the risks are not one-sided. Just like, sponsors are exposed […]
The Barnewall Model
The traditional financial theory assumes that all investors are rational. Hence, they believe that all investors will reach the exact same conclusion with regard to investment decisions. However, we see evidence of the opposite happening in the marketplace. Even if different people have the same information, they tend to process the information differently and come […]
Apple Inc. is the largest and the most profitable company in the entire world. However, of late, it has also found itself in the middle of several lawsuits. The company has been facing a legal battle with Spotify of late.
However, none of the legal battles even come close to the legal drama that is unfolding between Apple and Qualcomm. The two companies have been involved in a barrage of suits and countersuits across various countries.
Apple is suing Qualcomm for over $1 billion in the United States. The company has another lawsuit filed against Qualcomm in China for $145 million. Then there is yet another lawsuit which is in process. This one has been filed in the United Kingdom. At the same time, Qualcomm has also filed multiple lawsuits against Apple Inc. in Germany and in China.
In this article, we will have a closer look at the reason behind the legal battle between these two technology giants.
Qualcomm is suing Apple for many reasons. One of them is the fact that according to Qualcomm, Apple agreed to use their patented technology in exchange for a percentage of the revenue derived from the sale of iPhones.
Qualcomm believes that Apple is trying to renege on the agreement and end up paying less than what was agreed upon. On the other hand, Apple believes that Qualcomm is trying to double charge the firm.
On the one hand, Qualcomm makes money when it sells the chips to Apple and then it also charges a royalty on the same. According to Apple, this is an “illegal business model” and is being viewed with suspicion by regulators worldwide.
Qualcomm has been able to enforce its position in some places. For instance, in Germany, the sale of iPhones was banned for sometime, thanks to the Qualcomm lawsuit. The German courts had cracked down on the high handedness shown by the largest corporation in the world.
There is some merit to Qualcomm’s case. This is the reason why the German courts decided to back it up. Similarly, a Chinese court had ordered Apple to stop the sale of the iPhone in China. However, Apple was able to circumvent the ban thanks to their legal team.
Qualcomm has tried to implement a similar ban in the United States as well. It has urged the courts to stop further imports of the iPhone. Qualcomm also wants to ban the sale of iPhones which have already been imported.
Hence, the writing on the wall is clear, Qualcomm has Apple on the backfoot at many places across the world.
Lastly, Qualcomm has also accused Apple of stealing its intellectual property and giving in to Intel. According to Qualcomm, Apple was tired of the pricing power that it had.
As a result, it tried to steal the intellectual property from Qualcomm and give it to Intel. This would result in increased competition between Qualcomm and Intel and also reduced profit for the two companies. Apple would be the direct beneficiary since it would have to pay a lower price.
Apple has also countersued Qualcomm for patent infringement. Apple believes that some of the chipsets which were manufactured by Qualcomm stole technology from Apple. This technology pertained to the improvement of battery life which is achieved by switching off parts of the processor when they are not required.
Apple has also sued Qualcomm for operating an illegal business practice. Apple has reportedly co-operated with Korean regulators to bring the incorrect trade practices being followed by Qualcomm to light.
These lawsuits are having a massive economic effect on both parties. Some of the effects have been listed below:
Qualcomm reportedly punished Apple by not paying $1 billion in rebates after Apple decided to co-operate with Korean regulators. This fact is also being upheld against Qualcomm by regulators in the United States and many other countries.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
