MSG Team's other articles

12202 Team Management in the #MeToo Era: Actualizing a Discrimination Free culture

What is the #MeToo movement and how does it differ from Previous Movements The #MeToo movement is primarily an online driven trend where women across sectors and industries, speak up against sexual harassment at the workplace or in everyday settings and report the same to the concerned authorities. In addition, the #MeToo movement is also […]

12313 What is Agile Methodology and Its Game Changing Promise for the Digital Age

Introduction to the Agile Methodology These days, there’s much buzz around what is known as Agile Method of Working or the Agile Methodology as applied to all types of organizational processes and modes of working. While initially, Agile was introduced for the Software and Technology Development and Release cycles, it has now become a method […]

8864 Decision Making in a Confusing World

Trust, But Verify! Decision Making in an Information Overload Scenario From the time we wake up to the time we finish for the day, we are bombarded with all kinds of facts, opinions, news, and views. In this context, the key imperative is to how to decide on anything to do with our daily lives […]

12043 Woodrow Wilsons Vision on Public Administration

Woodrow Wilson was the 28th President of USA (1913-1921) and is often addressed as the father of American Public Administration. Wilson and his contribution to the subject of public administration is widely read and referred to. He was one of the first political leaders who emphasized the need to increase the efficiency of the Government. […]

10914 Recruiting a Diverse Team

The previous articles in this module discussed how diversity as a core value is important for organizations. We have also discussed how actualizing diversity means that the entire organization has to walk the talk instead of merely espousing it in name and then practicing something different altogether. One of the most important actions that any […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the United States, the government of the United States is the biggest player in the flood insurance industry. This has been the case ever since the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) was created in 1968.

Prior to 1968, many private insurance companies refused to provide private insurance to homeowners who had houses in flood-prone areas. This is the reason why the government decided to form the NFIP via an act of Congress. This body was created in order to provide insurance to owners at subsidized rates.

However, based on the performance date of over five decades, it can be concluded that the NFIP is just as inefficient as any other government organization.

This inefficiency can be gauged based on many facts, some of which have been listed below:

  1. The NFIP is a government body. Hence, it is not subject to any state regulations. On the other hand, private insurers are subject to state regulations. State regulations have evolved in order to keep up with the drastic changes in the marketplace. However, the NFIP still plays by the old rules which makes it an inefficient organization

  2. Almost all private insurance companies buy reinsurance cover. This is because they are aware that there may be many situations wherein they will not be able to pay out all the claims. In the absence of recourse to reinsurance, private companies will go bankrupt at the occurrence of such a catastrophic event.

    Since the NFIP is a government body, it does not feel the need to buy any reinsurance product. The reality is that NFIP is not immune to losses. In fact, it is more prone to losses than the average insurance company. However, NFIP simply relies on the fact that it has taxpayer backing. This complacency is obviously making it a grossly inefficient organization

  3. The NFIP is providing insurance to houses that they really should not be covering. Almost 25% of the claims paid by NFIP have been given to repetitive loss properties. These are houses that are known to be extremely risky and are routinely damaged in the event of a flood.

    Up until now, the NFIP has paid a total of $12 billion as damages for these properties. Any private insurance company would not continue to provide coverage to these properties. However, since taxpayer money is being spent, the NFIP is not really concerned and continues to provide coverage.

  4. The NFIP is not really an insurance company. This is because an insurance company is meant to charge premiums based on the risk profile of the property. However, the NFIP provides insurance to just about everybody.

    In fact, people owning the riskiest homes get the most subsidized policies. This means that the NFIP creates a situation wherein the government knowingly takes on catastrophic risks without any kind of reinsurance!

  5. Lastly, it is a known fact that the insurance industry is highly regulated. Throughout the world, governments lay down regulations which dictate how insurance companies can invest their money. The NFIP is exempt from all these regulations. This means that the NFIP does not even have to adhere to the most basic solvency measures.

All the above points clearly outline how a government supported monopoly has made the flood insurance market utterly disorganized. The NFIP does not seem like an insurance program at all. Instead, it seems like a program designed to give government-sponsored handouts to homeowners who take unnecessary risks.

Current Role of the Private Sector

The reality is that the private sector is active in the market despite the government monopoly. Private insurance companies still provide ancillary services and sell add-on products.

  • For instance, private insurance companies do not sell primary flood insurance as of now. However, they are authorized to sell top-up insurance. This means that customers can claim on these policies only after they have already claimed on the government issued policy and still haven’t been able to make good their losses.

  • Also, NFIP does not really have a distribution channel of its own. At the present moment, most of the policies being sold by NFIP are being sold by private insurance companies. Private insurance companies are only the distributors. The underwriting is done by the NFIP. The NFIP pays private companies a fee for using their distribution networks.

Future Role of the Private Sector

Various models are being explored to make the private sector more active in the flood insurance market. Increasing the participation of the private sector seems to be the only way to bring more efficiency into the markets.

The private sector already has a lot of data on the flood insurance patterns in the United States because of the current role that they play in the issuing and servicing of flood policies. This data will help them make effective underwriting decisions.

In the options that have been explored till now, private insurance companies seem to be keen in providing insurance to the low risk as well as moderate risk areas. However, they are completely averse to providing insurance in the high-risk areas.

The government has to be careful in order to ensure that the private sector is not allowed to take all the rewards without bearing the risks. This will make an already bad situation even worse.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The COSO Framework for Internal Control

MSG Team

The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry

MSG Team

Credit Derivatives: An Introduction

MSG Team