The COSO Framework for Internal Control
February 12, 2025
Human resource management deals with manpower planning and development related activities in an organization. Arguably it is that branch of management where ethics really matter, since it concerns human issues specially those of compensation, development, industrial relations and health and safety issues. There is however sufficient disagreement from various quarters. There are different schools of […]
Team-building games and activities can be an excellent tool for corporate organisations to bring employees together. Through indoor and outdoor fun activities that don’t feel like work, employees can foster camaraderie and improve communication. Creating shared team experiences can significantly improve job satisfaction and employee engagement, improving overall organisational success. Corporate teams are composed of […]
Scenario analysis is the third pillar of the framework suggested by the Bank of International Settlements in their Basel norms. In the previous articles, we have already studied a collection of internal and external loss data as well as the self-assessment of risks. However, it is important to note that the loss data collection framework […]
The Nature of Political Revolutions An often-overlooked aspect of the modern political economy is the capacity for change and renewal that is inherent in the way modern democracies work. Despite reversals of democracy where world over we are witnessing the retreat of democracy, there have been notable exceptions to the norm wherein some social and […]
With more organizations realizing the higher ROI associated with the virtual work environment, virtual teams are scoring over traditional teams. The business case for virtual teams talks about the cost savings, leveraging global talent, increase in productivity and higher profits. Virtual teams improve the bottom line of the business. Just like a tree gives tasty […]
In the United States, the government of the United States is the biggest player in the flood insurance industry. This has been the case ever since the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) was created in 1968.
Prior to 1968, many private insurance companies refused to provide private insurance to homeowners who had houses in flood-prone areas. This is the reason why the government decided to form the NFIP via an act of Congress. This body was created in order to provide insurance to owners at subsidized rates.
However, based on the performance date of over five decades, it can be concluded that the NFIP is just as inefficient as any other government organization.
This inefficiency can be gauged based on many facts, some of which have been listed below:
Since the NFIP is a government body, it does not feel the need to buy any reinsurance product. The reality is that NFIP is not immune to losses. In fact, it is more prone to losses than the average insurance company. However, NFIP simply relies on the fact that it has taxpayer backing. This complacency is obviously making it a grossly inefficient organization
Up until now, the NFIP has paid a total of $12 billion as damages for these properties. Any private insurance company would not continue to provide coverage to these properties. However, since taxpayer money is being spent, the NFIP is not really concerned and continues to provide coverage.
In fact, people owning the riskiest homes get the most subsidized policies. This means that the NFIP creates a situation wherein the government knowingly takes on catastrophic risks without any kind of reinsurance!
All the above points clearly outline how a government supported monopoly has made the flood insurance market utterly disorganized. The NFIP does not seem like an insurance program at all. Instead, it seems like a program designed to give government-sponsored handouts to homeowners who take unnecessary risks.
The reality is that the private sector is active in the market despite the government monopoly. Private insurance companies still provide ancillary services and sell add-on products.
Various models are being explored to make the private sector more active in the flood insurance market. Increasing the participation of the private sector seems to be the only way to bring more efficiency into the markets.
The private sector already has a lot of data on the flood insurance patterns in the United States because of the current role that they play in the issuing and servicing of flood policies. This data will help them make effective underwriting decisions.
In the options that have been explored till now, private insurance companies seem to be keen in providing insurance to the low risk as well as moderate risk areas. However, they are completely averse to providing insurance in the high-risk areas.
The government has to be careful in order to ensure that the private sector is not allowed to take all the rewards without bearing the risks. This will make an already bad situation even worse.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *