The Concept of Stock Keeping Units (SKU’s)
Companies like Wal-Mart are often credited with bringing in technology to the retail business. Prior to multinational companies introducing technology, retail was just a mundane business which was run without the use of any electronic or sophisticated retail systems. However, all that has changed now as retail is at the center of many technological innovations. […]
Asset Reconstruction Companies
The Indian banking system is reeling under a glut of Non Performing Assets (NPA’s). The unpaid debts of Indian corporations and households have risen to alarming levels. High level bureaucratic meetings are being held to get rid of this menace. Nonperforming assets could appear on the balance sheet of banks. This could cause a ripple […]
Point of Sale (PoS) System – Meaning, Importance and Benefits
With the advent of technology, more and more people have started accepting digital payments. This means that corporations have to provide their customers the option to make payments using a wide variety of payment methods. Some of these payment methods are electronic whereas others are not. Commercial banks have identified the possibility of providing good […]
Contribution Margin
Rearranging the Profit Equation: The contribution margin is created by rearranging the profit equation to provide the requisite details. The profit equation is as follows: Profit = Selling Price (x) – Variable Costs (x) – Total Fixed Costs It can be rearranged as : Profit = (Selling Price – Variable Costs)x – Total Fixed costs. […]
Bernie Madoff Scandal
The Bernie Madoff scandal was a story of a $50 billion embezzlement and Ponzi scheme run by Madoff Securities LLC. The scandal broke out in 2008 and sent shockwaves in the United States as well as across the world. The world had seen many Ponzi schemes. However, this one was unique given the fact that […]
Every year investment bankers help several companies raise capital from the markets. They help these companies in issuing securities and accessing more funds. The issue is that when these companies access the capital markets, they are often growing at a phenomenal pace. This means that these firms have a lot of projects where they want to make investments.
However, traditional sources of funding, such as promoter’s equity as well as bank loans, are unable to meet their funding needs. Hence, the firms often access the capital markets in a hurry.
It has been empirically proven that when these companies sell their securities, they often price themselves less. This means that there is significant underpricing at play when IPO’s are issued. This means that the companies issuing securities are leaving money on the table! It is amazing that such a trend is emerging despite the fact that capital markets all over the world are competitive, and hence any pricing discrepancies should immediately get corrected.
In this article, we will understand why IPOs are often underpriced and the role that investment bankers play in it.
There have been formal studies that have been conducted by many organizations to help zero down the reason behind the underpricing of IPOs. The four major reasons that have been listed in these studies are discussed below:
Hence, pursuant to the underwriting clause, the investment bank will have to hold on to some of the shares on their books. This would mean that their own capital gets locked, and they have to undertake the risks. This is the reason that investment bankers deliberately underprice their shares. Investment bankers have been arguing that this is incorrect. This is because it is not true that they hold a monopoly over the underwriting of shares anymore.
Ever since the Glass Steagall Act has been repealed, commercial banks, foreign banks, and a wide variety of institutions have the ability to underwrite shares. Hence, the competition amongst various underwriters should ideally eliminate the underpricing of shares.
Hence, if it is proven in court that the investors were sold an overpriced issue, the investment bankers could face a huge liability.
To counter this, investment bankers inherently assume that the directors of the selling company are not giving them 100% correct information. Hence, they deliberately lower the valuation and keep a spread for themselves and underprice the shares. This is so that even if adverse information is found out, later on, the investment bankers can still argue that even with new information, the issue is not overpriced, and hence, they shouldn’t be liable to pay damages to the shareholders.
However, the fact remains that in order to protect themselves from the lawsuits, the underwriters do have an incentive to provide a lower valuation to the shares.
The business of the company has been private until then, and hence their financial performance is also not disclosed to the public. The IPO process does make it mandatory to disclose financials for the past few years. However, there is still a huge information asymmetry. This is the reason that the bidding shareholders always bid a lower price. This is because they will bid on many IPOs on average. Some issues will turn out to be overpriced.
Hence, to be conservative, investors bid a lower price on an IPO. The selling company is also aware of this issue. However, they do not seem to protest because once the IPO has been issued and found to be worthwhile, the investing community provides a better valuation to the subsequent public offerings. Hence, it can be said that underpricing is a kind of premium that the company has to pay to induce the investors to bet their money on an unknown company.
When the market corrects and prices rise, both insiders, as well as outsiders, stand to gain. On the other hand, if the issue is overpriced, then neither insiders nor outsiders would want to buy it.
The bottom line is that even though the underpricing of IPOs might seem like an anomaly, it is not. Deliberately underpricing IPOs is a strategy that has been used by many companies as a marketing tool for their issues.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
