MSG Team's other articles

10162 Lessons from Cutting Edge Research on Gender Diversity

Introduction Statistics show that only 49 percent of all Fortune 1000 companies have women on their senior management and that too restricted to one or two of them. This is also the case with 45 percent of boards that have minimal presence of women on the boards. However, recent cutting edge research has shown that […]

10221 Management Skills – Leadership Skills for Efficient Functioning of an Organization

The success and failure of an organization is directly proportional to the effectiveness of the management. The superiors must share a healthy relationship with the employees for them to deliver their level best. Leaders need to acquire certain skill sets for an efficient functioning: Management needs to be impartial towards its employees. Rules and policies […]

11599 Toxic Workplaces, the Harm they do, and how Organizations can Avoid Becoming One

What are Toxic Workplaces and what Characterizes Them? Workplace culture is very important for organizations to bring the best out of their employees. Workplace culture is also important for employee engagement and employee productivity. Indeed, without an enabling workplace culture, employees would be demoralized and demotivated to work and this results in organizational atrophy and […]

11696 Types of Reinsurance Buyers

Many experts tend to look at reinsurance as a homogenized industry. The idea is that reinsurance companies sell insurance covers to commercial insurance companies. Many experts assume that since all cedant insurance companies are commercial in nature, they have similar needs for reinsurance. However, this is not the case. The market for reinsurance is not […]

9216 The Ethical Imperative and the Importance of Values

What Happens when Senior Management is Itself Unethical It is often the practice in organizations that whenever new recruits are being on-boarded, they are required to attend sessions on ethics and values. These sessions cover the need for ethical and transparent behavior by the employees and usually, someone from the compliance team or the senior […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Return on Investment is a popular analytical tool which is used to measure the benefits relative to the cost. There is an ongoing debate in the business world on which is better – co-located or virtual teams. Though there is no black and white answer to this question. But the key lies in carefully assessing the business situation and matching the right type of team. Applying ROI to the virtual team context is a challenge because it is not possible to assign monetary values to each of the benefit and cost factors. For the purpose of this discussion we have identified certain relevant costs and benefits factors of virtual teams as well as we have considered backward-looking or retrospective ROI which measures the value of the impact of team’s activities once completed.

Principles of Calculating ROI of Virtual Teams

  1. Only such costs and benefits should be included which are a significant fraction of the total costs and benefits of the team work, say at least 5%.

  2. It is better to benchmark the ROI of virtual teams to that of the traditional co-located teams to accomplish similar set of tasks and goals.

  3. The ease with which a particular costs and benefits factor can be realized also should be considered to determine the inclusion of that factor in the overall ROI calculation.

  4. Formula for the calculation of ROI = Benefits/Costs.

Elements for Measuring ROI of Virtual Teams

  1. Objective Business Outcomes refers to the factors that are linked directly to the bottom-line of the business (revenue & profit). This includes productivity, quality and customer satisfaction. Virtual teams bring together the best talent resources from across the globe to work on the project. Better customer satisfaction can be gained by placing the virtual team member closer to the client. This has positive impact on the bottom line. The only drawback is difficulties in coordination among the team members due to time zone, cultural and other differences.

  2. Subjective Business Outcomes refers to the factors that indirectly contribute to the bottom line of the business. Though many practitioners say that these should not be included because it is very difficult to arrive at their monetary impact. But research studies argument that these are potential benefits and costs which cannot be ignored. These are creativity & innovation, and organizational learning through best practices. Very often, new product development teams consist of virtual team members - this is the classic example where the subjective business outcome of innovation and learning are dominant force.

  3. Resource Input - In addition to the above stated outcomes, effective functioning of virtual teams require certain inputs such as travel, training/coaching, use of technology, personnel and other related admin costs.

Conclusion

Keeping in mind the current hyper-competitive market, it is impractical to solely rely on either co-located or virtual teams for doing the work entirely. On the actual grounds, organizations divide the work wherein some part is done by co-located members and some of it by virtual team members. This helps them to enjoy the easy & faster coordination of co-located teams as well as innovation & best practices learning from virtual members. ROI measurement comes as a handy tool for leaders and managers to take decisions related to alignment of team outputs with strategic intent as well as allocate resources accordingly to reap maximum benefits.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Critical Success Factors for Virtual Teams

MSG Team

Critical Competencies of Virtual Team Members

MSG Team

Managing Conflict in Virtual Teams

MSG Team