Conflict of Interest in Investment Banking
February 12, 2025
Whenever a company wants to sell its shares in the open market, it faces a very important question. The question is that what should the price of the shares being sold be? Over the years, investment bankers have tried multiple ways to find out the fair price at which the shares should be sold. Many […]
The Bank of Japan has recently decided that it will cut its rate below the zero percent mark. Bank of Canada has also hinted that it may also join the Bank of Japan in this extreme step and drop its interest rates below zero as well. However, most average people in the world are dumbfounded […]
Traditionally, pension funds were averse to equity investments. However, over the years, pension funds have been steadily pouring money into pension funds. This has been facilitated by the lower interest rates offered on fixed income securities as well as the rise in the value of stocks and other risky assets. Nowadays, most experts believe that […]
The United States is economically the most powerful nation in the world today. This is what makes the study of central banking in the United States all the more interesting. Almost all other countries in the world adopted central banking without any major hassles. However, in the United States, a lot of conundrum took place […]
The Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) or Special Purpose Entity (SPE) is one of the most used tools in infrastructure financing. It doesn’t matter whether the project is being constructed by a private company, a public entity, or in a public-private partnership. In most cases, special purpose vehicles are created for every infrastructure project. In this […]
It is often believed that the role of the investment banker is to sell the company for the highest price. The conventional belief is that the higher the price, the more successful the issue has been. However, over the years, the management of issuing companies, as well as investment bankers, have painfully discovered that a higher price post an IPO does not necessarily mean that a company is doing well. Instead, a higher price post an IPO can lead to a wide variety of problems. Some of these problems have been mentioned in this article.
If the informed investors find that the stock is grossly overvalued and there is very little possibility that the fundamental value of the stock will ever catch up to what is currently being offered at the market, they will start selling.
We have already studied in previous articles that institutional, as well as informed investors, tend to have large holdings of the stock of major companies. If they start selling the stock, then the market will be flooded with stock for sale. The end result would be an overcorrection, which would lead the price to crash.
In short, the overvaluation of a share is a temporary phenomenon that would sooner or later become the cause of a crash.
The investors start expecting a higher standard of returns from the companies. This higher expectation is seen in the form of pressure that is built around the quarterly results.
The company would be forced to undertake riskier projects in order to satisfy the need for a higher IRR and cash flow, which would ultimately justify the higher valuation. Over time, it is likely that the risky projects being undertaken would do more harm than good.
Instead of fudging numbers in order to live up to the hype, these companies would have been better off had they simply admitted the overvaluation and allowed the stock to settle at a fairly valued price.
Almost all companies which end up committing fraud start doing it just to meet the high expectations set up by the investors as a result of the overvaluation. Companies like Enron, WorldCom, and Waste Management are testimony to this face!
For instance, if company A has an overvalued share, it will try to exchange its overvalued shares for the real assets of company B. By doing so, it would have pre-empted the market. By the time the market realizes that the shares are overvalued, the company would have already acquired real valuable assets as a result of the overvaluation. Sometimes these strategies do succeed.
However, over time, the market has realized that if a company is hurriedly undertaking an acquisition and is using its stock to pay for it, the company is probably overvalued. Hence, the announcement of such a deal leads to a correction in the value of the acquirer’s shares. Also, even if the deal goes through, these acquisitions often fail. This is because these acquisitions are carried out in a hurried manner. Hence, they often lack due diligence, and something or the other goes wrong in this complex process of acquisition.
In many cases, it has been seen that when the valuation is particularly high, promoters sell their shares. This is done to encash the shares at a higher valuation and then later use the proceeds to buy even more shares when the valuation actually settles down. However, there is a time lag between selling the shares and then actually buying them back. There is a chance that the promoter may misappropriate the funds in this time lag.
Also, since direct selling of promoters’ shares is reported, some promoters pledge their shares to liquidate them when the valuation gets high. In many parts of the world, these pledging transactions also have to be reported.
The bottom line is that the task of the investment banker is to ensure that the shares of the company trade at a fair valuation once they are listed. The drawbacks of being undervalued are obvious. However, there are several drawbacks to the shares being overvalued as well.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *