MSG Team's other articles

12847 Components of Compensation – Part II

In the previous article (Part I) we looked at some of the components of compensation that are paid out to employees and the way in which these components are fixed by HR managers and companies. In this article (Part II), we shall look at some components of compensation like Basic and Variable Pay (including the […]

12999 Why Making CSR Outcomes Part of Performance Appraisals Helps Organizations

Corporates are under Pressure to Meet their CSR Commitments It is often the case that corporates struggle to meet their Corporate Social Responsibility or CSR commitments and responsibilities due to a variety of reasons. Indeed, the fact that corporates often sideline CSR in the pursuit of profits means that they often pay lip service to […]

12050 Factors Leading to Efficiency at Workplace

Following factors play a crucial role in increasing the efficiency of employees at workplace. Clearly defined roles and responsibilities Employees need to have well defined roles and responsibilities at the workplace. Individuals need to be clear as to in which all areas they need to contribute their level best and what all skills would help […]

9770 What is Human Resource Planning?

Human Resource Planning (HRP) is the process of forecasting the future human resource requirements of the organization and determining as to how the existing human resource capacity of the organization can be utilized to fulfill these requirements. It, thus, focuses on the basic economic concept of demand and supply in context to the human resource […]

8727 Human Capital Management – Meaning and Important Concepts

To understand the meaning of Human Capital Management let us first find out the meaning of “Capital”. What does the word “Capital” stand for? Capital refers to already produced durable goods which further contribute to the production of goods and services. In simpler words, capital refers to any produced good/service which enables an individual/organization to […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Excessive Executive Pay is the Problem

In recent years, the topic of excessive executive pay has been at the forefront of efforts to promote good corporate governance. This is because there have been understandable and genuine concerns about this aspect, which is leading to, some effects on the governance structures of companies. For instance, the CEO of Wal-Mart takes home a pay that is 150 times more than the lowest paid worker is. This is indeed a matter of concern as in an ideal scenario, the gap between the lowest paid worker and the CEO must not exceed double digits and that too within a multiple of 50. Further, the fact that greed leads people to do things that they would not otherwise do is a truism that has to be taken into consideration in this respect.

Apart from this, excessive executive pay is having a corrosive effect on organizational cultures, which results in heartburn and a sense of powerlessness at the lower levels of the hierarchy.

Misalignment of Incentives

One of the reasons put forward for the ongoing global financial crisis is that the misalignment of incentives or the culture of unrestrained risk that was brought about due to greed manifested in the corrupt practices at the core of the financial crisis.

The misalignment of incentives we are talking about relates to paying the bankers and the CEO’s too, much, which led them to take greater risks in the hope of garnering ever-larger bonuses. As the aftermath of the crisis proved, with so much at stake and since the CEO’s and the bankers are human after all, there was inevitable corruption starting from the top. Because the reward systems did not incentivize only performance measured in a broad index but rewarded humungous profits at the expense of everything else, there was a tendency to throw caution to the winds and indulge in risky behavior.

Some Strategies to curb Skyrocketing CEO Pay

A possible strategy to limit skyrocketing CEO pay would be to design a reward system that places performance at a premium but limits how much of it can be translated into monetary and non-monetary terms. For instance, making CEO’s accountable for a broad range of performance measures like corporate responsibility, organizational dynamics like culture and wellbeing of employees, apart from profits and bottom line imperatives alone would be a reward system that is holistic in nature. Further, making the CEO’s accountable to their shareholders in a more direct manner would place curbs on excessive CEO pay, which has been the topic of many heated debates in company AGM or Annual General Meetings.

Closing Thoughts

Given the fact that excessive CEO pay has deleterious effects on organizational health and that this has contributed in some measure to the ongoing global economic crisis makes a compelling case for limiting the CEO pay. The reward systems must be designed in such a way as to incentivize performance but not excessive risk. Finally, the reward systems must take into account the fact that the CEO alone does not make the company exist but it is the combined efforts of all employees that keeps the ship afloat.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The Problem with ESOP’s

MSG Team

Towards a Total Rewards Management System

MSG Team

Role of Bonuses in Rewards Management

MSG Team