Informational Training Methods
Informational training methods are basically used to teach facts and figures and for developing a change in attitude. There is a one way communication between the trainer and the trainee that involves the transfer of information without many deliberations. New policies, programs, code of conduct are transferred using informational training methods. Lectures, audio visuals, self […]
Some Things to Consider When Choosing Off-Beat or Non-Mainstream Careers
Career Options in Our Parents and Grandparents Generations In our grandparents and parents generations, it was the norm to choose careers that offer job security, preferably life-long employment, and those that provided pension and other benefits. Indeed, such was the lure of these aspects that many among those generations chose to work for the government […]
Social Entrepreneurship at its best Microfinance and the Revolution in the Third World
How Small Entrepreneurs face lack of access to capital In recent years, prominent among the revolutions in personal finance and savings has been the rise of microfinance or microcredit as it is also known as. To understand how this works, picture yourself as a small businessperson (you can be a farmer with a marginal landholding, […]
Top HR Trends for 2019: Technological Convergence and Smarter HR Management
Increasing Use of Technology and Pervasive Influence of Smart HR Management 2019 is upon us and what does it mean for the HR (Human Resource) field? While predictions in the Age of Accelerated Technological Change are sometimes difficult and can go “way off the mark”, nonetheless, there are some general trends that would impact the […]
What is Lobbying, How it Works, and What are its Advantages and Disadvantages?
What is Lobbying and What do the Lobbyists do? We often read about the terms, lobbying, and lobbyists, being used in the mainstream media and the business press. Most of us also read about how lobbyists have influenced the outcome of a particular policy or how they have succeeded in convincing lawmakers and elected representatives […]
In an organizational context, groupthink and group behavior are important concepts as they determine the cohesiveness and coherence of the organizational culture and organizational communication. For instance, unless the HRD function communicates the policies clearly and cogently, the employees would not participate and comply with them wholeheartedly. Hence, molding group behavior is important for organizations. However, this cannot be construed to mean that all employees must think and act alike. On the contrary, innovation cannot happen when group behavior is the same across all levels.
The point here is that while organizations must strive for cohesiveness and coherence, they must not sacrifice the principles of individual creativity and brilliance that are at the heart of organizational change and innovation. In these turbulent times, there is a need for individuals to take a stand and be firm on the direction that the organization seeks to take.
Of course, group behavior needs to be inculcated in organizations for the simple reason that employees must conform to the rules and regulations that govern organizations. Hence, there is a need for uniformity and consistency in the way organizational group behavior has to be molded. Towards this end, groupthink and group behavior must be encouraged by the HRD function as a means to ensure cohesiveness in the organization.
In the technology sector, we often find employees straight out of campuses behaving as though they are still in college. While some of this freethinking and freewheeling spirit is good for innovation, the HRD function must guard against the tendency to be flippant with the organizational rules and procedures.
Further, competitiveness can be encouraged but it should not come at the expense of collaboration and cooperation that are at the heart of organizational success.
On the flip side, group behavior can be detrimental to the organizational health as well. This happens when the decisions of the top management are not challenged or are followed blindly leading to the leadership thinking that whatever they do is right. We do not mean to say that there must be fractious fights in the organization.
On the other hand, there must be a space for free expression of ideas and thoughts and true democratic decision making ought to take place. Only when organizations inculcate these elements in their DNA can they succeed in the competitive business landscape of the 21st century.
Finally, group think can be a powerful motivator as well as inhibitor. The motivating aspect happens when because of group think; employees feel bonding with their peers and colleagues and hence ensure that they give their best to the job. The inhibitor works when employees feel that their individual creativity and brilliance are being sacrificed at the altar of conformity.
Hence, the leadership as well as the HRD function has their task cut out to ensure that group behavior does more good than harm. There is a need for a nuanced and balanced approach towards group behavior to leverage the individual creativity and at the same time not sacrifice organizational cohesiveness and coherence.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
The Midlife Crisis of the Middle Manager! What it is and What can be Done to Address the Problem
February 12, 2025
When Dismissal is the Best Course! How Corporates Decide to Fire Employees
February 12, 2025
