MSG Team's other articles

9337 Financial Modeling: Important Metrics

Financial modeling can be considered to be the science of making informed decisions regarding a company based on data simulations. Most financial models pay keen attention to a variable such as revenue and expenses as well as their drivers. Data regarding these variables is extensively collated as well as analyzed. However, it turns out that […]

11756 Value Averaging Method of Investment

There are many investors who believed that dollar-cost averaging was not a good strategy and that it did not work well in the long run. However, they liked the averaging part of the strategy. This meant that they wanted a systematic plan to make investments at regular intervals. Also, they wanted to adjust their investments […]

9212 Estimating Future Dividends

We have discussed various types of dividend payout models. We have discussed the Gordon growth model, the H model, one stage, two stage, multi-stage and even spreadsheet models. These models are varied in their approach towards calculating the value of a firm. Yet the common link amongst these models is the fact that they all […]

10283 Market-Based Vs Bank-Based Financial Systems

Commercial banks do make some money by providing services such as transaction processing and payroll processing to their clients. However, to a large extent commercial banks make money by making loans to corporations. Interest income is the predominant source of income for banks around the world. Now, this puts commercial banks in direct competition with […]

8989 Distribution of Risks in an Infrastructure Project

Infrastructure projects tend to have a lot of financial risks. In many cases, the risks are poorly managed. In fact, incorrect risk management is one of the main reasons behind the delay, which can cause cost overruns in the long term. It is difficult to reduce the total risk that any infrastructure project faces. However, […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Formula

Equity to Fixed Assets Ratio = Equity / Total Fixed Assets

  • Equity includes the retained earnings
  • Total Fixed assets excludes intangible assets of the firm

Meaning

The “equity to fixed assets” ratio shows analysts the relative exposure of shareholders and debt holders to the fixed assets of the firm. Thus, if the “equity to fixed assets” ratio is 0.9, this means that shareholders have financed 90% of the fixed assets of the company. The remaining 10% as well as current assets and investments have all been financed by debt holders.

Assumptions

There is an implicit assumption that the number of shares outstanding has remained unchanged. This is because the ratio measures the total amount of equity. The total amount of equity can be increased by issuing shares at lower prices to the public or to the promoters. However, this may not be a desirable scenario since more shares means a loss to individual shareholders.

Interpretation

The “equity to fixed assets” ratio is used by a variety of stakeholders for different purposes. The common interpretations that are drawn based on this ratio have been listed below:

  • Creditworthiness: Bankers and other lenders use the “equity to fixed assets” ratio widely. They use it to understand how much of the fixed assets of the firm are already financed by debt. A firm with a low “equity to fixed assets” ratio has not utilized its credit to the maximum and therefore extension of credit is relatively secure. This is because in the event of a liquidation, the creditors have the first claim over the proceeds recovered from the assets.

  • Conservative vs. Aggressive: What might be good news for the bankers may not be such great news for the equity shareholders. This is because if the firm has a very low “fixed assets to equity” ratio, it means that the firm is underutilizing its credit. This means that the shareholders could have achieved a higher rate of return in case the company managed its operations better and used credit to its advantage. Hence a high “equity to fixed assets” ratio is not a very good sign either.

  • Less than 0.65 Not Recommended: Based on empirical evidence, certain analysts have concluded that companies that have a “equity to fixed assets” ratio of less than 0.65 are very risky bets. Companies where shareholders own less than 65% of the fixed assets are likely to cash strapped and debt ridden. These companies usually run into solvency and liquidity issues and therefore must be avoided.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

What are Common Size Statements ?

MSG Team

Cash Ratio – Meaning, Formula and Assumptions

MSG Team