MSG Team's other articles

11635 The True Cost of Owning a Property

Home ownership is often considered by the layman as being a single expense i.e. the purchase price of the property. However, if we were to truly analyze the situation, home ownership consists of several expenses. It is easy to forget about some of the expenses while budgeting. Therefore in this article we have prepared a […]

12756 Choosing the Right Counterparty in Real Estate

The average person assumes that buying real estate from an individual is about the same thing as buying it from a developer. However, that is not the case. Even though the property under consideration is the same, the motives and capabilities of the buyer vary vastly. As a result, the deals made will be very […]

10049 Is Less Government the Answer in Market Economies or the Other Way Around ?

The Debate between Neoliberalism and Socialism An ongoing debate in the United States and in Europe is whether there must be less government or more government. This means that there are proponents of the government extending its sphere of influence into all sectors and opponents of this view who see this as socialism creeping into […]

12815 Companies Need to Create Long Term Value to Survive the Uber Competitive Market

The 24/7 Real Time Global Marketplace Makes Firms Live for the Moment The present global marketplace as well as regional and nations marketplaces are uber competitive and in addition, dominated and driven by rapidly changing market conditions where short term thinking triumphs and the scenario is complicated with the incessant buzz of 24/7 news cycles […]

9432 GDP and Depleting Natural Resources

The GDP system’s absurdities do not end with social evils. Mindlessly following this system has also wrecked havoc on the environment. Many arguments have been made against the GDP system from an environmental point of view. There is no questioning the fact that the resources of earth have been severely depleted in the recent past. […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

There is a relatively new form of a business model emerging in the real estate space across the world. The model is addressed by several names viz. co-working spaces, on-demand workplaces, shared offices, etc. This workspace model has gained impetus because of spiraling real estate costs. It is also very effective for companies who do not want to tie themselves down with long-term lease obligations and instead have a flexible cost structure. In this article, we will have a closer look at this trend of shared offices.

Common Reasons Companies Opt For Co-Working Spaces

  • Cost: This method is particularly useful for startup companies. Most of the startup companies today are in the hi-tech space. This means that they require offices with facilities such as video conferencing, VOIP enabled phones, leased internet lines, etc. However, setting up all these facilities from scratch is a bit expensive for startup companies who are usually strapped for cash. Hence, it is economically as well as operationally feasible to use this plug and pay model for office space. For a startup company, this works out to be more expensive on a per month basis. At the same time, bigger corporations find this model to be cheaper by around 25%

  • Infrastructure: Co-working spaces allow the cost of the operation to be reduced without affecting the infrastructure quality. Usually, such shared workspaces have conference rooms and even video conferencing facilities. Companies get readymade infrastructure from day one. They can focus more on the core tasks performed by the company instead of paying attention to administrative tasks which add to the time and cost but do not produce any value for the customer.

  • Travel Convenience: Several multinational companies tend to opt for this model in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. This is because these companies do not require a full-fledged office in these cities. Instead, they have a team of 10 to 15 personnel. They do not want to compromise on the quality of office space or the facilities that they provide their employees. Also, they want their offices to be centrally located because most of the times these employees work with the sales department and need to travel extensively. It is for this reason that shared working spaces become a viable alternative. The infrastructure is shared with other teams. It is just that these other teams may belong to a different organization altogether.

  • Shorter Commute Times: Employees in big cities are tired of spending hours commuting to and from work. Apart from a nine-hour job, many people spend another four hours commuting to and fro. This commute time does not add value and hence should be eliminated. One of the ways of eliminating this is to start using shared workplaces.

    All workers should not be required to commute to one location for work. Instead, workers should be allowed to log in to the nearest shares workplace center. Time saved commuting results in more productive employees who can work longer hours in tasks that actually add value to the organization.

  • Flexibility: Increasing the size of an organization becomes a logistical problem in traditional offices. For instance, a company may want to increase its employee strength by ten employees. However, they cannot rent additional space for only ten more employees. They have to rent an entirely new office unit.

    Alternatively, they have to cramp up the existing workplace and ensure that they ten new employees fit in the existing office. However, with shared workspaces, this is not the case. Companies can rent exactly as many desks they need and for the exact period of time that they need.

Problems with Shared Workspaces

  • Cost Allocation: Allocating costs on a shared workplace can be a very difficult task. In a fully leased office, the company pays all the electricity bills, water bills, property taxes etc. However, in a shared workplace, these costs need to be apportioned. This is where disagreements begin to happen.

    Some companies believe that headcount in a more appropriate metric to allocate costs. On the other hand, other companies may believe that headcount is more appropriate. Also, since the bill is being shared, companies will not have an incentive to minimize the usage of electricity, water or other such scarce resources.

    Developers are trying to circumvent this problem by building these costs within the lease prices. However, that ends up causing wastage of resources and even leads to disputes in many cases.

  • Privacy: Shared workspaces are cheaper and may have better infrastructure. However, most companies would not be comfortable in locating their critical operations to such facilities. The reason behind this is simple. There is a high chance of data or other intellectual property being stolen. Also, if the strategy of a company is leaked to its competitors, it may lose its competitive edge. The shared workspace model, by definition, cannot overcome this problem.

The future of workspaces is likely to be a fusion of the two models. The regular, mundane work which is not mission-critical may be performed at shared workspaces because of lower costs and other advantages that they offer. However, higher-end tasks which involve sensitive data and strategy information may continue to remain within the realm of leased workspaces.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The Link between Credit Growth and Real Estate Bubbles

MSG Team

Choosing the Right Counterparty in Real Estate

MSG Team

China’s Real Estate Market

MSG Team