Cultural Dimensions of Leadership
April 3, 2025
Introduction Leadership in organizations is dictated and determined according to a variety of reasons and factors including personality, cultural, and country and regional aspects. Among the various factors, the cultural dimension of leadership is often not highlighted as it is taken as a given. However, with globalization and the advent of tighter integration and interconnectedness,…
The leadership continuum was originally written in 1958 by Tannenbaum and Schmidt and was later updated in the year 1973. Their work suggests a continuum of possible leadership behavior available to a manager and along which many leadership styles may be placed. The continuum presents a range of action related to the degree of authority…
Loss of Trust and Faith and the Rise of Populists Public trust and faith in institutions is at an all time low. Starting with the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 in the United States and then the Sovereign Debt Crisis in Europe in 2009, including the Brexit vote in the United Kingdom, and the election…
According to this model, the leader has to match the leadership style according to the readiness of subordinates which moves in stage and has a cycle. Therefore, this theory is also known as the life-cycle theory of leadership.
The theory, developed by Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard, is based on the ’readiness’ level of the people the leader is attempting to influence.
Readiness is the extent to which followers have the ability and willingness to accomplish a specific task.
Ability is the knowledge, experience, and skill that an individual possesses to do the job and is called job readiness.
Willingness is the motivation and commitment required to accomplish a given task. The style of leadership depends on the level of readiness of the followers.
The readiness(R) is divided into a continuum of four levels which are:
![]() | R1 - low follower readiness - refers to low ability and low willingness of followers i.e. those who are unable and insecure |
![]() | R2 - low to moderate follower readiness - refers to low ability and high willingness of followers i.e. those who are unable but confident |
![]() | R3 - moderate to high follower readiness - refers to high ability and low willingness of followers i.e. those who are able but insecure |
![]() | R4 - high follower readiness - refers to high ability and high willingness of followers i.e. those who are both able and confident |
The direction is provided by the leader at the lower levels of readiness. Therefore, the decisions are leader directed. On the other hand, the direction is provided by the followers at the higher levels of readiness. Therefore, the decisions in this case are follower directed. When the followers move from low levels to high levels of readiness, the combinations of task and relationship behaviors appropriate to the situation begin to change.
For each of the four levels of readiness, the leadership style used may be a combination of task and relationship behavior.
By combining the task and the relationship behavior, we arrive at the following four different styles of leadership which correspond with the different levels of readiness as shown in the Figure 1.
![]() | S1 - Telling: This style is most appropriate for low follower readiness (R1). It emphasizes high task behavior and limited relationship behavior. |
![]() | S2 - Selling: This style is most appropriate for low to moderate follower readiness (R2). It emphasizes high amounts of both task and relationship behavior. |
![]() | S3 - Participating: This style is most appropriate for moderate to high follower readiness (R3). It emphasizes high amount of relationship behavior but low amount of task behavior. |
![]() | S4 - Delegating: This style is most appropriate for high follower readiness (R4). It emphasizes low levels of both task and relationship behavior. |
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *