MSG Team's other articles

9920 Informal Networks in Organizations and Organizational Effectiveness

Introduction It is said that humans are social beings and hence, have an innate need to communicate, relate, and exchange information with others. We are all aware of how we form networks of familial relatives, peers, friends, and in this age of social media, virtual contacts. Therefore, being social and engaging with others comes naturally […]

9298 Falling Gender Ratio and Ways to Prevent the Decline in Numbers of Women

While the gender ratio was hovering around 930-950 throughout the earlier decades when there were fewer women than men as a statistical fact, this has become more alarming in recent years because the number is falling rapidly. When taken together with the overall increase in population of India that has a large percentage of young […]

10935 Leadership Development: Reinventing Management for 21st Century

A Failure of Leadership in Management ? The world is facing unprecedented upheaval and chaos in virtually every sphere of human activity. Where it is economic crisis, climate change, resource depletion, failure of political systems, or the breakdown of the social order, there is only gloom and doom all over us. Hence, the broader question […]

12428 Behavioral Systems Approach to Public Administration

The behavioral approach to public administration owes its genesis to the Human Relations Movement of the 1930s. The movement started off as a protest to the traditional approaches to public administration that focused on organizations, institutionalization, rules, and code of conducts etc with absolutely no mention of people who are the center of all these […]

10924 Reinsurance and Man-Made Catastrophes

The purpose of reinsurance is to financially help the ceding insurer when they face very high losses which are linked to a catastrophe. However, it is important to note that reinsurance companies do not consider all catastrophes to be the same. There is a very clear and marked distinction between natural calamities called “nat-cats” and […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the United States, the government of the United States is the biggest player in the flood insurance industry. This has been the case ever since the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) was created in 1968.

Prior to 1968, many private insurance companies refused to provide private insurance to homeowners who had houses in flood-prone areas. This is the reason why the government decided to form the NFIP via an act of Congress. This body was created in order to provide insurance to owners at subsidized rates.

However, based on the performance date of over five decades, it can be concluded that the NFIP is just as inefficient as any other government organization.

This inefficiency can be gauged based on many facts, some of which have been listed below:

  1. The NFIP is a government body. Hence, it is not subject to any state regulations. On the other hand, private insurers are subject to state regulations. State regulations have evolved in order to keep up with the drastic changes in the marketplace. However, the NFIP still plays by the old rules which makes it an inefficient organization

  2. Almost all private insurance companies buy reinsurance cover. This is because they are aware that there may be many situations wherein they will not be able to pay out all the claims. In the absence of recourse to reinsurance, private companies will go bankrupt at the occurrence of such a catastrophic event.

    Since the NFIP is a government body, it does not feel the need to buy any reinsurance product. The reality is that NFIP is not immune to losses. In fact, it is more prone to losses than the average insurance company. However, NFIP simply relies on the fact that it has taxpayer backing. This complacency is obviously making it a grossly inefficient organization

  3. The NFIP is providing insurance to houses that they really should not be covering. Almost 25% of the claims paid by NFIP have been given to repetitive loss properties. These are houses that are known to be extremely risky and are routinely damaged in the event of a flood.

    Up until now, the NFIP has paid a total of $12 billion as damages for these properties. Any private insurance company would not continue to provide coverage to these properties. However, since taxpayer money is being spent, the NFIP is not really concerned and continues to provide coverage.

  4. The NFIP is not really an insurance company. This is because an insurance company is meant to charge premiums based on the risk profile of the property. However, the NFIP provides insurance to just about everybody.

    In fact, people owning the riskiest homes get the most subsidized policies. This means that the NFIP creates a situation wherein the government knowingly takes on catastrophic risks without any kind of reinsurance!

  5. Lastly, it is a known fact that the insurance industry is highly regulated. Throughout the world, governments lay down regulations which dictate how insurance companies can invest their money. The NFIP is exempt from all these regulations. This means that the NFIP does not even have to adhere to the most basic solvency measures.

All the above points clearly outline how a government supported monopoly has made the flood insurance market utterly disorganized. The NFIP does not seem like an insurance program at all. Instead, it seems like a program designed to give government-sponsored handouts to homeowners who take unnecessary risks.

Current Role of the Private Sector

The reality is that the private sector is active in the market despite the government monopoly. Private insurance companies still provide ancillary services and sell add-on products.

  • For instance, private insurance companies do not sell primary flood insurance as of now. However, they are authorized to sell top-up insurance. This means that customers can claim on these policies only after they have already claimed on the government issued policy and still haven’t been able to make good their losses.

  • Also, NFIP does not really have a distribution channel of its own. At the present moment, most of the policies being sold by NFIP are being sold by private insurance companies. Private insurance companies are only the distributors. The underwriting is done by the NFIP. The NFIP pays private companies a fee for using their distribution networks.

Future Role of the Private Sector

Various models are being explored to make the private sector more active in the flood insurance market. Increasing the participation of the private sector seems to be the only way to bring more efficiency into the markets.

The private sector already has a lot of data on the flood insurance patterns in the United States because of the current role that they play in the issuing and servicing of flood policies. This data will help them make effective underwriting decisions.

In the options that have been explored till now, private insurance companies seem to be keen in providing insurance to the low risk as well as moderate risk areas. However, they are completely averse to providing insurance in the high-risk areas.

The government has to be careful in order to ensure that the private sector is not allowed to take all the rewards without bearing the risks. This will make an already bad situation even worse.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The COSO Framework for Internal Control

MSG Team

The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry

MSG Team

Credit Derivatives: An Introduction

MSG Team