The COSO Framework for Internal Control
February 12, 2025
In the previous article, we have already learned about how fronting works in reinsurance. We now know how different entities have to collaborate in this complex arrangement called fronting. The concept of fronting is fairly recent and has been growing quite rapidly. However, before deciding whether or not fronting is right for a particular reinsurance […]
Insurance marketplaces are just like other markets. They are full of buyers and sellers i.e. cedant insurance companies as well as reinsurers who have very different objectives. There might be some cedant insurers who might be very conservative whereas there might be others who might be reckless when it comes to risk-taking. The same thing […]
A team is formed when individuals with a common goal come together on a common platform. The team members must complement each other and avoid silly conflicts among themselves. Communication plays a very important role in team building and extracting the best out of the team members. A team member must clearly understand what his […]
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) are a very important and popular type of credit derivative. With the growth in structured finance, the origination and trading of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) has seen a massive uptick. Their demand has increased multifold and as a result, newer products such as synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) are also being […]
Sigmund Freud was born in 1856 in Austria, but lived mainly in Vienna. The founder of Psychoanalysis school of thought earned his medical degree in 1881 and became a neurologist. Upon completing his graduation, he started his private practice and treated his patients having psychological problems. The key concepts which were introduced by Sigmund Freud […]
Technology has disrupted the entire business world and the field of risk management is no exception. All across the world, companies have been spending millions of dollars in order to upgrade themselves and use technology in a manner that helps them minimize risks. There are several advantages to this approach which we already studied in the previous article. However, there are also some disadvantages related to risk management information systems.
In this article, we will try to make the reader aware of the disadvantages of using a risk management information system.
The first disadvantage of using an automated risk management information system is that it may not be useful for all companies. These systems are only useful for companies that have a certain kind of profile. Some of the characteristic features of such companies are as follows:
Companies that have a large number of risks to track benefit from using risk management information systems. Hence, if a company does not own a lot of movable and immovable property and does not use several different risk management products, the integrated system may have limited utility.
If a company does not have to deal with a large number of third party vendors with each transaction having its own different terms and conditions, the risk management information system may not be very useful
If a company does not have its business interests located across different geographical areas and hence is forced to use different currencies and languages, the risk management system may be unnecessary.
If the company does not need automated actions to be taken based on certain pre-defined business rules then risk management information systems may not add value to the business proposition of the company
The bottom line is that risk management information systems are valuable only for companies which have a wide variety of complex business interest that span various geographies. For small and medium-sized companies, using simple spreadsheets to manage the risk seems like the best alternative.
Risk management information systems can be quite expensive. They are often sold as standalone software solutions or as solutions that can be integrated with the overall enterprise resource planning software. Either way, planning and implementation of these systems can be expensive as well as time-consuming. To make matters worse, the implementation of information systems is not a one-time activity.
These systems need to be updated every few months and hence there are significant maintenance costs associated with their purchase. Also, access to risk management software is often restricted to higher-level employees. Hence, business stoppages have been reported since employees have to wait for their managers before performing certain tasks. These business stoppages also cost money and add to the expense of the software.
Risk management software can be complicated to use. This is the reason that employees have to be trained to use them. Also, if employees leave the organizations, their replacements also have to be trained. This training takes time and also costs money. Hence, productivity goes down and expenses go up. As mentioned earlier, this makes the cost of implementing risk management information systems prohibitive for smaller and medium-sized companies.
In the absence of automation, employees have to collect data from different parts of the organization. This helps them build relationships and also identify practices that help make the organization vulnerable to risks.
In the case of a risk management information system, the entire process of data collection, as well as analysis, is automated. In some cases, systems are being programmed to make decisions based on available data using artificial intelligence. However, as more and more tasks become automated, employees interact less with the processes. Hence, they have a lesser understanding of the systems and processes. This is the reason why the gains from automation often end up being offset by the losses arising due to lower process knowledge.
Lastly, risk management information systems collate all of the organization’s important data in one place. This creates data security risks. If the risk management information system is hacked, it could cause severe damage to the company. This is because important data could be hacked into. Details regarding the assets, employee personal data, financial data are all part of the risk management information system.
Centralization of data brings advantages in the data processing. However, it also creates a situation wherein the data security of the organization is jeopardized. The end result is that organizations have to spend large sums of money in order to protect sensitive data. This ends up adding to the overall cost of having a risk management information system.
The bottom line is that it is not feasible for every company to have an integrated risk management information system in place. Since the costs are so high, companies need to have large-scale operations before they can afford these systems. In the absence of large-scale systems, it would be better to use spreadsheet-based or lesser sophisticated systems rather than incurring cost overruns because of investing in the more sophisticated ones.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *